Latest News from The DRTV Centre

Latest News

From the DRTV Specialists

BootyMax May Be The Next Big DRTV Product

NYC, Jan 20, 2017

There is a reason you see so many TV ads, and there is a reason it is so expensive to air those TV ads: they work. 

For any company striving to have a successful consumer product launch, TV is paramount -- especially direct response television (DRTV) advertising. A large television ad spend helps to get product moving off the shelves.

"My philosophy with any product I'm backing is that you absolutely must put your money where your mouth is. That's why I'm supporting my company's current product launch of BootyMax with $100,000 to $400,000 per week in national DRTV ad buys," said Jeff Kurani, President of Tekno Products.

Should DRTV Be In Your Marketing Mix?

By Peter Koeppell, Koppell Direct, published 5 December 2016

With today’s hyper-distracted consumer, marketers need a healthy media mix to spark consumer engagement. One frequently overlooked option is direct response television (DRTV) advertising, a discipline we've used with success for years.

DRTV, which consists of both commercial spot lengths and program-length advertising, gives advertisers two distinct advantages: more time to break through media clutter and remnant media rates that lower airtime costs by as much as 60% or more. DRTV can be used to drive online and retail purchase intent, revive a brand in a flagging product category, and act as an effective pull marketing tactic. But before analyzing these possibilities, let’s explore the unique characteristics of DRTV by contrasting them with traditional or “general” television advertising.

In the simplest terms, general advertisers are often looking to build awareness, whereas DRTV advertisers use a call-to-action to get consumers to take action. General advertisers buy their media in specific programs, are guaranteed to both air and for that airing to deliver a specific number of eyeballs against the advertiser’s target audience. In contrast, DRTV advertisers air in broad daypart rotations (for example, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.) 

TV Response: new rules, new roles

The world of response planning has become increasingly complex over recent years.  Understanding the key drivers of response over the short, medium and long-term is a constant challenge, but one that’s essential if advertisers are to optimise their investment.

Key Points

  • TV creates the highest volume of short to medium-term sales.   It drives more media-driven sales than any other communication channel
  • TV advertising drives the highest volume of cost-efficient response:  because of its reach and scale, TV advertising keeps generating a cost-efficient level of response at higher levels of spend than other media.
  • TV advertising dominates longer-term response.  Half of all media driven response comes 3-24 months post campaign and TV is responsible for 52% of the impact that media has in the longer-term. 
  • Direct response TV should be planned to maximise coverage above frequency – c.90% of total response was generated after a viewer had seen a TV ad once or twice, therefore in most cases, reach should be prioritised.

Source: Thinkbox

TV ads create most short to medium term sales

TV advertising generates the most short to medium term sales and dominates long term response according to research from GroupM, commissioned by commercial TV marketing body Thinkbox.

The study ‘TV Response: new rules, new roles’ was designed to look at the different media channels’ effects on driving response and TV advertising’s role.

GroupM found that media account for on average 39% of sales in the short to medium term (within three months of a campaign finishing); 33% of these media-driven sales are from TV advertising, more than any other communication channel. Paid-for online search created 22%, online display 12%, affiliates 10%, print 8%, direct mail 8%, radio 3% and outdoor 1%.

It also found that TV is responsible for 44% of all media-driven interactions for brands on Facebook (e.g. likes and comments). This effect of TV on Facebook was two-fold: TV ads prompt consumers to directly engage with Facebook; and TV drives significant volumes of sales and, after purchase, consumers go on to engage with Facebook.

Source: Thinkbox 5.11.15

UK TV Viewing 2015 (H1)

The average UK viewer watched a total of 3 hours, 37 minutes of linear TV on a TV set per day in the first half of 2015 - 650 hours of TV.

Commercial TV viewing was stable year on year in H1 at 2 hours, 23 mins a day per viewer.

Ad spend on TV grew 9% year on year in H1. All major categories saw growth - the highest being in FMCG and DIY.

The average viewer saw 45 TV ads a day.

Source: Thinkbox

Mark Ritson: Happy birthday TV advertising – still the most effective tool in a marketer’s arsenal

The issue with anniversaries is that everything gets so retrospective. Rather than look to the future, an anniversary inevitably makes us look back – in rose tinted spectacles – rather than celebrate the current and future potential of something. That’s certainly been the case with the 60th anniversary of TV advertising which has proven to be an orgy of nostalgia for chimps in bowler hats, old men looking for books about fly fishing and small boys pushing yon bike up yon hill with tha’ bread in’t basket.

TV advertising does not need all this ennui. Too many digital savants have already predicted the death of TV as a marketing medium and this 60th anniversary risks becoming a wake if we are not careful. Rather than look back at TV advertising’s greatest moments I would much rather celebrate its current awesomeness as a vital marketing tool.

So, just for the rest of this column, forget about the 60th anniversary. In fact, go one better and completely erase TV advertising’s long and storied history from your brain. Imagine TV ads were invented in 2014 by a young media planner who suddenly realised that you could insert several short promotional films into TV programming to market a variety of branded products and services. Rather than the old girl on the block, imagine how TV would be viewed versus the more traditional social media options like Facebook and Twitter if we’d only just discovered it.

For starters, what would we all make of the spectacular reach of TV ads? Prior to the invention of TV advertising in 2014 most advertisers had become used to reaching single digits of the UK population. Instagram, Pinterest and Linkedin for example all hovered around 9% of the British population. Twitter impressed even more with 19% and, of course, Facebook with 43% reach was the big daddy of them all. You can imagine the incredulity of marketers after the launch of TV advertising and the astonishing realisation that its reach was 94% of the population.

Of course reach is only half the equation. Many social media traditionalists sneered at such a huge audience and assumed it must have come at the expense of actual time spent with the medium. Social media, after all, boasted a whopping two hours and thirteen minutes of activity each day across its platforms. Again, however the revolutionary new TV ad medium was far superior. The average viewer watches 3 hours and 44 minutes of TV each day – exactly the length of Gone with the Wind. And within that activity, each viewer sees 45 TV ads each and every day – akin to watching a whole Seinfeld episode just containing TV ads.

This new medium of TV advertising might have become appealing to the general population, but many digital strategists pointed out that it was likely to falter when it comes to targeting the younger tech-literate generations that had grown up with social media as their prime source of interaction. Imagine their amazement when TV quickly became popular with even the youngest and most digital demographics. In 2014, after just one year of existence, TV watching and the ads contained within had become the dominant viewing activity of 15 to 24 year olds. With 41% of their audience time spent watching TV it had become almost three times more time consuming than social media each day.

Another great USP for TV advertising was that it was actually much more of a social media than, er, social media. Six times as many viewers said they would talk about TV ads than those they had encountered on so-called social media. They may well use social media as a channel to do the talking, but the vast majority of the brands and ads that are being discussed there are those featured in TV advertising.

Best of all was the ROI. Throughout the history of social media there had been debate after debate on what ROI was, whether it was even relevant and how it should be measured. The new medium of TV advertising learned from these mistakes and commissioned expert and objective assessments that demonstrated that, on average, every pound invested in TV advertising returned £1.79 in profit to the advertiser.

Obviously, the 60th anniversary of TV advertising is a cause for retrospection and reflection. But don’t think for one minute that TV advertising is ready to retire and reach for its slippers just yet. It remains the biggest, most vibrant and most effective tool in the marketing arsenal.

Happy birthday old girl, see you in 2075.

Showing 7 - 12 of 110 Articles